What is the point?
A temp late [!] ( to view later.)
Related charge:
Consciousness
Value of information.
Linguistic turn
Mind outside
??? Not exactly
They say time is the 4th dimension, not that is only one dimention[!]
What about perspective? Or perpendicular?
My point at this time is that I believe I developed my template of the tetrahedron before running into Arthur Young. And I am only now in the process of watching his seminar on process theory.i do know I must credit Plato for an earlier model (based on The Republic) which I revamped with the help of Einstein's famous equation and geometry. (X,Y,Z & P). P for perpendicular and perspective(only now so designated) let alone Plato's ideal or the point.
FORMER HOME OF BEATINGAROUNDTHEBUSH.ORG >> HOME OF Political_Progress_For_People.blogspot.com >> >> >> Political Prodding and Probing People for Progress << << << >>> [[ For those NOT...BeatingAroundTheBush See links.]] <<< [[ EMAIL: LeRoy-Rogers at comcast net ]]
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query perpendicular. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query perpendicular. Sort by date Show all posts
Friday, March 10, 2017
Monday, September 23, 2013
Heuristic Concurrence and
Hermeneutics *or
* knot (5th D)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristic
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/concurrence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermeneutics
Math is next to Godliness, geometry agnostic** to physics.[!]
** [!] i.e. to sort or transcend later
From the principles or tri angle(tan gent)lations or field works. The 4thD = a. Time b. Perpendicular c. E=mcHammer*** d. Tangent to eachGe. (4 mu lations)
*** two inserts 9-24 (@ later & Hammer) also Re: * Knot to go on, but more on 4 mu lations/=/"action of bringing or proposing"
plane fecundity.
* knot (5th D)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristic
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/concurrence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermeneutics
Math is next to Godliness, geometry agnostic** to physics.[!]
** [!] i.e. to sort or transcend later
From the principles or tri angle(tan gent)lations or field works. The 4thD = a. Time b. Perpendicular c. E=mcHammer*** d. Tangent to eachGe. (4 mu lations)
*** two inserts 9-24 (@ later & Hammer) also Re: * Knot to go on, but more on 4 mu lations/=/"action of bringing or proposing"
Labels:
Abba,
GeOhMeTry,
IO9,
KUOW,
La Repubblica,
music,
Physics,
Pope Francis,
Queen,
YouTube
Sunday, September 21, 2014
"Timing is everything."
[Rough draft: ]
A phrase I recently Googled.
And today noted.
1. a. Curve Balls?, e. Connecting the Dots, l. PC [^]
2., 3.,
4. (b.s.) "perpendicular": a. Anachronism, b. Heuristic Concurrence and ...
[continued 9-22-14: To whom it may regard...]
Hot, cold, wet, dry. Father Quido Nye[!]
Up s. c.[!] d'acronible candle schtick.
Nye: A. B.
Quido: A. Mocumentary: Expelled (Exposed?) , B.
Facebook Town Hall (amended) , C., D., E. 2 Reid's later? , F. Missing M-bed , G. Wise Crack , H. REFRAIN is a Heckuva Paradocs[!] , I. A Funny Thing Happened... , J. Dog Days, Raven Nights?, K. Darned if you do, darned if you don't..., L. Frank Knight , M. The Challenge? , N. Off Track Betting , O. "Can't Get There From Here" , P. McCain camp sexist. , Q. Stranger than Science (Fiction) [?]
Father: A., B. Rat Races Van Mices?, C. Pink Floyd,
The Ge Oh Metrics?
The thing about timing(TIME) is that there is more than one perspective on its definition. Not to be ironically reflective by taking time from timing, but that may cover an aspect of it. Maybe scratch or reboot this. The forth(`) dimention(^) is the stick. Not to men shun the Three Amigoes.
Re: 4th Dimention
(^) Arthur Young(sic)
(`) my psych [?]
[This has become a rather hard draft but(~) speaking of timing (dot,dot,dot)?]
(~) A., B., C. D., E., F. (buh dump ump : d. Para-model) Now that is Gravy~ Toss~ [!] ~OW[!]
~ \\ BLANK NETWORK, ~ [<\\>] a.,b., c.Wittgenstein
Gray V~: a., b. Re-Mix, c.Anachronism, d.Loose Threads, e., f. Divide to conquer?, g. 13 and a half men? h. A Plea to Congress
[!] OW almost litter ally! Actually I just flipped open the hard copy and landed on the strip.
A phrase I recently Googled.
And today noted.
1. a. Curve Balls?, e. Connecting the Dots, l. PC [^]
2., 3.,
4. (b.s.) "perpendicular": a. Anachronism, b. Heuristic Concurrence and ...
[continued 9-22-14: To whom it may regard...]
Hot, cold, wet, dry. Father Quido Nye[!]
Up s. c.[!] d'acronible candle schtick.
Nye: A. B.
Quido: A. Mocumentary: Expelled (Exposed?) , B.
Facebook Town Hall (amended) , C., D., E. 2 Reid's later? , F. Missing M-bed , G. Wise Crack , H. REFRAIN is a Heckuva Paradocs[!] , I. A Funny Thing Happened... , J. Dog Days, Raven Nights?, K. Darned if you do, darned if you don't..., L. Frank Knight , M. The Challenge? , N. Off Track Betting , O. "Can't Get There From Here" , P. McCain camp sexist. , Q. Stranger than Science (Fiction) [?]
Father: A., B. Rat Races Van Mices?, C. Pink Floyd,
The Ge Oh Metrics?
The thing about timing(TIME) is that there is more than one perspective on its definition. Not to be ironically reflective by taking time from timing, but that may cover an aspect of it. Maybe scratch or reboot this. The forth(`) dimention(^) is the stick. Not to men shun the Three Amigoes.
Re: 4th Dimention
(^) Arthur Young(sic)
(`) my psych [?]
[This has become a rather hard draft but(~) speaking of timing (dot,dot,dot)?]
(~) A., B., C. D., E., F. (buh dump ump : d. Para-model) Now that is Gravy~ Toss~ [!] ~OW[!]
~ \\ BLANK NETWORK, ~ [<\\>] a.,b., c.Wittgenstein
Gray V~: a., b. Re-Mix, c.Anachronism, d.Loose Threads, e., f. Divide to conquer?, g. 13 and a half men? h. A Plea to Congress
[!] OW almost litter ally! Actually I just flipped open the hard copy and landed on the strip.
Sunday, May 08, 2016
The 5th Dimention[!]
File to read.
FYI: time and politics are the 4th
Not to(o) Hegel, but the other three are physics, psychology & philosophy.
paragraph 2
objective / subjective related to grids?
paragraph 3
"now" is a calculus
Is "t" perpendicular to x, y, & z?
(see p2) how?
FYI: time and politics are the 4th
Not to(o) Hegel, but the other three are physics, psychology & philosophy.
paragraph 2
objective / subjective related to grids?
paragraph 3
"now" is a calculus
Is "t" perpendicular to x, y, & z?
(see p2) how?
Saturday, January 09, 2016
New Meta Theory
The anthropomorphism of systems.**
Have your ad hominem and eat it too.
[The Digger You Deep?]*
*NFRY
**The personalization of math, geometry and logic.
[** + * = Quantum Sovereignty ]
Is it possible this is the nexus of Science and Theology?
Is it Schroedingers' coin of epistemology?
Is this support for the small "t", large "T": truth of Nietzsche?
[[ footnotes to reading*: "dangers in overemphasizing(...~...)"perplexed by the relation"{subject/object/rules}(5.)]]
Now that may be the ticket!!! Knot?^ The faith ~ science nexus.
{{Rough ramble: 3 dimensions are? 4this? 5th other!
Perpendicular perspective: x,y,z, space~time/point~sphere }}
{{{The result is in the balance.}}}
^/*
Have your ad hominem and eat it too.
[The Digger You Deep?]*
*NFRY
**The personalization of math, geometry and logic.
[** + * = Quantum Sovereignty ]
Is it possible this is the nexus of Science and Theology?
Is it Schroedingers' coin of epistemology?
Is this support for the small "t", large "T": truth of Nietzsche?
[[ footnotes to reading*: "dangers in overemphasizing(...~...)"perplexed by the relation"{subject/object/rules}(5.)]]
Now that may be the ticket!!! Knot?^ The faith ~ science nexus.
{{Rough ramble: 3 dimensions are? 4this? 5th other!
Perpendicular perspective: x,y,z, space~time/point~sphere }}
{{{The result is in the balance.}}}
^/*
Wednesday, January 22, 2014
Anachronism
1-21-14 (no text) (saved in doc)
1-22-14 * added
1-23-14 scroll down for edit(**) comments
1-24-14
Norman Goldman: Radical Middle?
Ed Schultz: Ed Head of the People?
Mike Malloy: Contrary Brin
The Less Than Pentagonal File
==============================================
No apologies (*) to Mike Malloy, nor insult to Contrary Brin*, but maybe the mechanics(or dimanics) of the parallel points. Akin to Newton’s orbit(**). i.e. 3-body problem. And even deeper Hegelian remarks to Terral, in regard to not getting there yet. i.e. accidental reference under Post-Doc Terral nature of the point. Parallels do not tangent.
when-the-parallels-meet-and-talk
where-parallels-meet.html
1-22-14
1-22-14 * added
1-23-14 scroll down for edit(**) comments
1-24-14
Pop Four?
Randi Rhodes: Defender and Explainer of Obamanomics?Norman Goldman: Radical Middle?
Ed Schultz: Ed Head of the People?
Mike Malloy: Contrary Brin
The Less Than Pentagonal File
No apologies (*) to Mike Malloy, nor insult to Contrary Brin*, but maybe the mechanics(or dimanics) of the parallel points. Akin to Newton’s orbit(**). i.e. 3-body problem. And even deeper Hegelian remarks to Terral, in regard to not getting there yet. i.e. accidental reference under Post-Doc Terral nature of the point. Parallels do not tangent.
Further ow[!]
parallels-meet-religion-and-nationalism-in-the-early when-the-parallels-meet-and-talk
where-parallels-meet.html
1-22-14
Time is a funny thing. The fourth dimension? What about perpendicular to the 3? But then there is the parallel of not having time to follow every tangent let alone parallels.
**1-23-14 links titled and morphed, lines 4 and 6 added. Link(or line)5 actually read or rubric's fit ?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
